In today's rapidly changing global landscape, infrastructure investment is unparalleled in its complexity and significance. Geopolitical events, strategic realignments, and economic shifts now strongly influence investment patterns worldwide. As the demand for robust infrastructure—from energy to digital connectivity—continues to rise, investors and stakeholders face an increasing need for comprehensive risk management strategies. This new paradigm requires evaluating not only financial returns but also assessing geopolitical, regulatory, and supply chain vulnerabilities. Roberta Brzezinski, a partner at Control Risks, emphasizes the crucial role risk managers play in navigating these complexities. According to her, political events are now dictating infrastructure investment priorities across vital sectors like energy, technology, and global trade routes.

In a world where geopolitics dictate market moves, risk management has become the compass guiding infrastructure investment.

Compare Insurance Quotes in Minutes

Get fast, free quotes from top providers for Auto Insurance.

Easy. Fast. No commitment.
Enter your ZIP code to get started.





Brzezinski points out that the global energy transition is now inextricably linked with energy security concerns. Governments worldwide have shifted from viewing the energy transition in isolation, moving towards comprehensive policies that aim to build renewable capacity while reducing reliance on external energy sources. For instance, national policy initiatives have surged in support of renewable energy, pushing related infrastructure investments to an unprecedented US$3 trillion in 2024. Of this, US$2 trillion is allocated to clean energy technologies. Yet, this massive financial commitment demands rigorous risk management to handle market volatility and geopolitical uncertainties. While electricity grids have seen significant investment growth, reaching US$85 billion, other critical infrastructure areas still command greater attention.

The uneven distribution of clean energy investments also poses a risk. Major economies like China, the US, and the European Union lead the way, supported by policies like the EU's REPowerEU. For investors, this concentration heightens exposure risks tied to overdependence on certain markets, necessitating careful diversification strategies. Meanwhile, emerging markets in India, Brazil, Southeast Asia, and Africa are witnessing increased investment due to evolving policies and infrastructure improvements. However, these areas introduce greater risks due to their still-developing regulatory frameworks and potential political instabilities, thus intensifying the need for expert risk management.

In the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, European energy policies have undergone significant shifts. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) into Europe plummeted following the conflict, highlighting new geopolitical risks. Yet, over time, the crisis has united EU efforts in adopting cleaner technologies and diversifying their energy sources more broadly, illustrating the critical role of risk management in facilitating adaptive strategies amidst rapid policy changes. Furthermore, infrastructure funding has become a geopolitical tool, particularly in developing regions. China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) now underscores sustainability, transparent development, and global standards. The emergence of rival corridors, such as the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) and the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII), requires navigation through overlapping geopolitical interests. As these corridors expand, national alignments, like Saudi Arabia's strategic positioning in US and Chinese-related corridors, present both opportunities and challenges. Additionally, emerging technologies like small modular reactors (SMRs) and green hydrogen play pivotal roles in reshaping infrastructure priorities, requiring astute risk evaluation for scalability and regulatory approvals. Risk managers must also anticipate the ramifications of technological advancements such as AI. In 2024, a significant US investment of $500 billion in AI infrastructure necessitates keen oversight of energy demands and technological lifecycles. As Brzezinski aptly sums up, as infrastructure enters a transformative phase, maintaining an eye on geopolitical scenarios and strategic planning is crucial for sustaining a competitive edge.