In April 2025, changes to Colorado's home insurance market were proposed, aiming to address persistent challenges linked to catastrophe risks. Despite amendments, insurance industry stakeholders express that the current legislative proposals still need further refinement. The Rocky Mountain Insurance Information Association, led by Executive Director Carole Walker, is at the forefront of these discussions. Walker asserts that although progress has been made, the legislation is not yet adequate. In particular, Colorado faces a dual threat from hail and wildfires, raising insurance costs and complicating reform efforts. The state’s current position risks becoming comparable to California if significant policy corrections are not realized.

Proposed insurance reforms in Colorado offer progress, yet further changes are essential to balance risks and business viability.

Compare Insurance Quotes in Minutes

Get fast, free quotes from top providers for Auto Insurance.

Easy. Fast. No commitment.
Enter your ZIP code to get started.





The legislation in question reflects broader national pressures on the insurance market, largely influenced by increasing occurrences of catastrophic losses. Colorado ranks second nationally for hail-related claims and harbors many homes at risk of wildfires. A contentious element of the bill was a provision requiring insurers with a loss ratio below 75% over three years to reduce their rates by 5%, a measure that was ultimately removed. Concerns were raised that such measures might lead to smaller firms exiting the market and could compel larger insurers to reduce their operations in Colorado. Additionally, the proposal involved the adoption of a wildfire reinsurance and mitigation enterprise, which relies on consumer fees instead of traditional tax-based funding.

The reinsurance and mitigation enterprises, particular to Colorado’s legislative environment, seek to ensure funding availability for essential programs. There remains, however, uncertainty regarding whether these enterprises can engage in reinsurance activities without conflicting with private market processes. A proposed 1% fee on all property insurance policies to fund this initiative has sparked debate. Insurers advocate for optional participation, challenging the directive to operate in high-risk areas while lowering premiums. Nevertheless, there is a developing agreement on the necessity of a home-hardening program, intended to fortify residences against disaster risks. This includes providing grants for impact-resistant roofs and wildfire mitigation measures, potentially allowing homeowners to bypass the enterprise fee.

Furthermore, Walker emphasizes the need for adjustments in Colorado's regulations concerning additional living expenses, highlighting that they currently enforce time constraints without financial limitations. As the legislative session moves closer to its conclusion on May 7, there is optimistic anticipation of the bill's passage with the support of state leaders, including Governor Jared Polis, House Speaker Julie McCluskie, and Insurance Commissioner Michael Conway. These reforms aim to create a balanced framework, promoting both homeowner protection and insurance industry stability. The proposed changes, though met with mixed industry reactions, underscore the complexities of managing insurance in high-risk regions. Stakeholder opinions and strategies revealed throughout the legislative process will play a crucial role in shaping the future of Colorado's home insurance landscape.